White leghorn or white rock?

21hens-incharge

Overrun with beasties
Joined
May 9, 2017
Messages
65
Reaction score
62
Points
77
Location
Northern Colorado
I think for 13 weeks she looks just fine. Maybe she IS hatchery quality but she needs more time to fill out.

My flock has some slow growing breeds and given time most fill out just fine.

If you got them to show them or for breeding then MAYBE she isn't the best quality.
If they are for pets/eggs laying then I wouldn't worry to much.
 

Leah567

Overrun with beasties
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
66
Reaction score
27
Points
83
Location
Texas
DSC06118.JPG
here is another pic.
 

Leah567

Overrun with beasties
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
66
Reaction score
27
Points
83
Location
Texas
DSC06330.JPG
DSC06331.JPG
 

Attachments

  • DSC06333.JPG
    DSC06333.JPG
    421 KB · Views: 282

Leah567

Overrun with beasties
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
66
Reaction score
27
Points
83
Location
Texas
I posted more pics. What do you all think?
 

21hens-incharge

Overrun with beasties
Joined
May 9, 2017
Messages
65
Reaction score
62
Points
77
Location
Northern Colorado
I still say white rock not leghorn. She has more growing to do since she is young.

I have had BA that were much different in size. Little Rue weighed a full pound less then her hatch mate Kanga. In my current batch of BA chicks for example some carry the tail up and some down, 2 have long backs and necks. Just hatchery stock for laying hens/pets. Still good birds for my purposes.
 
Top